Andrew Samuel Hango v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20232:22-cv-09385California710 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-09385-FMO-DFM Document Filed 03/13/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

J S -

2 3 4 5 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 ANDREW SAMUEL HANGO, ) Case No. CV 22-9385 FMO (DFMx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND v. ) RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND

IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ) TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE UNITED

ENFORCEMENT, et al., ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ) NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Defendants. ) ) 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has reviewed the Complaint, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which plaintiff has objected. The court recognizes plaintiff’s argument that venue is proper in this district on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. (Dkt. 10, “Objections” at 2). The general venue rules of …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.