Warden

Paul Hupp v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20235:21-cv-01670California557 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 5:21-cv-01670-RSWL-MAR Document Filed 03/13/ Page 1lof3 Page ID #:1107

'o' UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL HUPP, EDCV 21-1670-RSWL-MAR

Petit; ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

CEPETONSE AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

vy UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE □ JUDGE [30]; AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILIT

WARDEN,

16 Respondent. 17 186 Pursuant to U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”) [1], records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [30]. Further, as required by Federal Rule of Civil DA Procedure 72(b) (3), the Court has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the Report and …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.