BASF Corporation v. SJS Collision Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20232:22-cv-05018California4,445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-05018-RSWL-MRW Documenti16 Filed 03/14/ Pagelof19 Page ID #:

"0" UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BASF CORPORATION, CV 22-5018-RSWL-MRWx

Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’ S MOTION for v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT [14] be SJ’S COLLISION CENTER, et 16] al., Defendants. _ Plaintiff BASF Corporation (“Plaintiff”) initiated this Action against Defendants SJ’s Collision Center (“Defendant SJ”) and Grigor Garibyan (“Defendant Garibyan”) (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging breach of contract and unjust enrichment. DA Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants on the breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims. Having reviewed all papers submitted pertaining to the Motion, the Court NOW FINDS AND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.