Nathan Cooley v. County of Los Angeles
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20232:23-cv-01809California605 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:23-cv-01809-DMG-AFM Document Filed 03/15/ Page 1 of Page ID #:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. CV 23-1809-DMG (AFMx) Date March 15, 2023
Title Nathan Cooley v. County of Los Angeles, et al. Page 1 of
Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION
On March 10, 2023, pro se Plaintiff Nathan Cooley filed a Complaint in this Court against Defendants County of Los Angeles and the Honorable Lisa Sepe-Wiesenfeld, Mark Young, and Bobbi Tillmon, judges of the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Compl. at 2 [Doc. # 1]. In his Complaint, Cooley asserts both federal question and diversity jurisdiction. Id. at 3.
On its face, the Complaint reveals that this Court does not have diversity jurisdiction because all…