Eduardo Sapetto v. Tate and Kirlin Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20232:23-cv-00245California245 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:23-cv-00245-SPG-AGR Document11 Filed 03/16/ Pagelof1 Page |ID#:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-00245-SPG(AGRx) Date March 16, 2023 Title Eduardo Sapetto v. Tate and Kirlin Associates, Inc.

ee Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

P. Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK

OF PROSECUTION

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before March 31, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.