Saulo C. Alvarado Amaya v. Ray Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20232:22-cv-05904California858 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-05904-SSS-E Document Filed 03/20/ Page 1 of Page ID #:5833

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAULO C. ALVARADO AMAYA, ) NO. CV 22-5904-SSS(E) ) Petitioner, ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, v. ) ) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RAY MADDEN, Warden, ) ) OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) Respondents. ) ______________________________) 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been made. 23 The Court notes that, in his Objections, Petitioner argues that the cases of Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519, 522 (1952) and Ker v. United States, 119 U.S. 436, 444 (1886) are inapplicable to a claim regarding the violation of an extradition treaty. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.