Paulina Oropeza Martin v. Walmart Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20232:22-cv-09084California1,479 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-09084-MCS-MAR Document Filed 03/20/ Page1of4 Page ID #:472

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

pees 2222ev eg March 20,205 Title Paulina Oropeza Martin v. Walmart, Inc. et al.

Present: The Honorable Mark C. Scarsi, United States District Judge

Stephen Montes Kerr —___———NotReported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND AND DENYING AS MooT MOTION To DIsMIss (ECF Nos. 11, 13) (JS-6)

Plaintiff Paulina Oropeza Martin moves to remand this action to state court. (Notice of Mot., ECF No. 11.) Defendants Walmart, Inc. and Julianne Ortega oppose the motion, and Plaintiff filed a reply. (Opp’n, ECF No. 18: Reply, ECF No. 20.) Also before the Court is a fully briefed motion to dismiss the complaint. (MTD, ECF No. 13; MTD Opp’n, ECF No. 19; MTD Reply, ECF No. 21.) The Court deems the motions appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.