Lashify, Inc. v. Urban Dollz LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20232:22-cv-06148California6,756 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-06148-GW-AFM Document 139 Filed 03/21/ Page 1 of Page ID #:3925

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES DIVISION 12 LASHIFY, INC., Case No.: 2:22-cv-06148-GW-AFMx

Plaintiff, [Proposed] Protective Order1

v.

URBAN DOLLZ LLC d/b/a URBAN DOLL; SIMA MOSBACHER; and CHRISTOPHER SIMONIAN D/B/A

DOLL HOUSE LLC,

18 Defendants. 19 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 20 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 21 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 22 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 23 Accordingly, the parties hereby petition the Court to enter the following Protective 24 Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections 25 on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from 26 27 1 This Protective Order is based substantially on the model protective order provided under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.