Edward Colley v. Michael Vierra

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20232:19-cv-01988California996 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:19-cv-01988-MEMF-AGR Document Filed 03/22/ Page 1 of Page ID #:676

3 4 5 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD COLLEY, Case No. 2:19-cv-01988-MEMF-AGR 11 Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED

MICHEAL VIERRA, ET AL., STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendants.

17

20 21 Under 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, the Report 22 and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), the parties’ Objections and their respective responses to the objections. ECF Nos. 1, 52, 54-57. The Court has engaged 25 26 1 Plaintiff has styled his Objections as a “Motion for Review and Plaintiff’s Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” ECF No. 55. To the extent Plaintiff has separately moved to have his Objections reviewed, in light of this Order, the motion is denied as moot. 28 -1- Case 2:19-cv-01988-MEMF-AGR Document Filed 03/22/ Page 2 of Page ID…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.