Edward Colley v. Michael Vierra
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:19-cv-01988-MEMF-AGR Document Filed 03/22/ Page 1 of Page ID #:676
3 4 5 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD COLLEY, Case No. 2:19-cv-01988-MEMF-AGR 11 Plaintiff,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED
MICHEAL VIERRA, ET AL., STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Defendants.
17
20 21 Under 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, the Report 22 and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), the parties’ Objections and their respective responses to the objections. ECF Nos. 1, 52, 54-57. The Court has engaged 25 26 1 Plaintiff has styled his Objections as a “Motion for Review and Plaintiff’s Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” ECF No. 55. To the extent Plaintiff has separately moved to have his Objections reviewed, in light of this Order, the motion is denied as moot. 28 -1- Case 2:19-cv-01988-MEMF-AGR Document Filed 03/22/ Page 2 of Page ID…