Farzaneh Khadivi v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20232:22-cv-04889California238 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-04889-SPG-GJS Document Filed 03/23/ Page lofi Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. CV 22-04889-SPG(GJSx) Date March 23, 2023 Title Farzaneh Khadivi v. Merrick Garland et al Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

P. Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK

OF PROSECUTION

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before April 6, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.