Nathan Cooley v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20232:23-cv-02080California396 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:23-cv-02080-DMG-PD Document Filed 03/23/ Page 1 of Page ID #:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-2080-DMG (PD) Date March 23, 2023

Title Nathan Cooley v. County of Los Angeles, et al. Page 1 of

Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present

Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

On March 20, 2023, Plaintiff, who proceeds pro se, filed the complaint in this action. He alleges claims against the County of Los Angeles, Judge Mark A. Young, Judge Lisa Sepe- Wiesenfeld, and Judge Bobbi Tillmon under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, based on actions taken in the Santa Monica courthouse. [Doc. # 1.] He alleges that between 2016 and 2023, “the County of Los Angeles Court illegal[ly] obtain[ed] jurisdiction . . . under fraudulent pretense[s] and denied [Plaintiff] his civil rights, . . . lied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.