Nathan Cooley v. County of Los Angeles
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20232:23-cv-02080California396 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:23-cv-02080-DMG-PD Document Filed 03/23/ Page 1 of Page ID #:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. CV 23-2080-DMG (PD) Date March 23, 2023
Title Nathan Cooley v. County of Los Angeles, et al. Page 1 of
Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present
Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
On March 20, 2023, Plaintiff, who proceeds pro se, filed the complaint in this action. He alleges claims against the County of Los Angeles, Judge Mark A. Young, Judge Lisa Sepe- Wiesenfeld, and Judge Bobbi Tillmon under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, based on actions taken in the Santa Monica courthouse. [Doc. # 1.] He alleges that between 2016 and 2023, “the County of Los Angeles Court illegal[ly] obtain[ed] jurisdiction . . . under fraudulent pretense[s] and denied [Plaintiff] his civil rights, . . . lied…