Solomon J. Andrews v. Chad Bianco

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20235:22-cv-02006California3,140 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ) SOLOMON J. ANDREWS, ) Case No. EDCV 22-2006-DSF (JEM) ) Plaintiff, ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v. ) DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH ) LEAVE TO AMEND CHAD BIANCO, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 17 On November 10, 2022, Solomon J. Andrews (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner 18 proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint alleging violations of his civil rights pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 1, 2023, Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis was 20 granted.

SCREENING STANDARDS

22 In accordance with the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the 23 Court must screen the Complaint to determine whether the action: (1) is frivolous or 24 malicious; (2) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (3) seeks monetary 25 relief against a defendant who is immune from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.