Tyrrell Promotions Ltd v. Exoto Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Tyrrell Promotions Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) moved for an order to show cause why Defendant Exoto, Inc. and its President, Tony Keusseyan (collectively, “Defendants”), should not be held in contempt for violating this Court’s permanent injunction issued on May 24, 2006. (Dkt. 21). The Court granted the Plaintiff's Motion and issued an Order to Show Cause why Defendants should not be held in contempt for violating the Court’s injunction. ECF No. 134. The Court, for the forthcoming reasons, and having considered the parties’ papers and arguments and testimony at the March 2023 evidentiary hearing, now finds Exoto and Tony Keusseyan in contempt. Il. BACKGROUND A. Underlying Lawsuit Plaintiff filed the underlying lawsuit against Defendants on September 2, 2005. The complaint alleged four causes of action: (1) cancellation of mark; (2) common law trademark infringement; (3)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
2:05-cv-06539-SVW-JWJ March 29, 2023 No. …