Vanessa Johnson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20232:22-cv-07425California4,649 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

On September 9, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in the Los Angeles Superior Court. (Notice of Removal (“NOR”), Ex. A (Complaint) (Docket No. 1)). The Complaint alleges Plaintiff was discriminated and retaliated against on the basis of disability in violation of the California Family Rights Act (“CFRA”) and the Fair ______________________________________________________________________________

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 22-7425-MWF (MRWx) Date: March 30, 2023 Title: Vanessa Johnson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), and that she was wrongfully terminated in violation of public policy (Id.) The Complaint therefore seeks monetary damages and attorney’s fees. (Id.). After filing an answer in the Superior Court, Defendant filed its NOR on October 12, 2022, based on diversity jurisdiction. (NOR ¶ 9). Plaintiff filed this Motion about five months later on March 2. (Motion (Docket No. 19)).

II. LEGAL STANDARD

In general, “any civil action brought in a state court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.