Branden Markell Wise v. Giselle Matteson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20232:22-cv-04054California354 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O, JS-

2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 10 BRANDEN MARKELL WISE, Case No. CV 22-4054-MEMF(AS)

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS AND

v.

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRTE JUDGE [ECF

GISELLE MATTESON, NO. 18]

Respondent. 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (ECF No. 1), all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 18) to which no objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.1 22 23

25 1 The Court notes that at the time the Report was issued, the only related proceedings pending in state court were post-conviction state proceedings—specifically, an appeal of the trial court’s denial of the section 11790.95 petition for resentencing. As of the date of this Order, the California Court of Appeal has since affirmed the trial court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.