Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HECTOR GODINEZ, Case No. 2:21-cv-09579-SSS-RAO

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,

v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES

WARDEN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“Report”). The time for filing objections to the Report has passed, and no objections have been received. The Court hereby ADOPTS and ACCEPTS the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. For completeness, the Court notes that, to the extent Petitioner has raised a cognizable procedural due process argument, see Clayton v. Biter, 868 F.3d 840, 846 (9th Cir. 2017) (suggesting that a cognizable federal procedural due process claim might exist where state court denied a resentencing petition under California Penal Code section…