Sacorey Clark v. McKinney

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20235:22-cv-01505California797 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Background

On August 24, 2022, Petitioner Sacorey Clark (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“Section 2241”) (“Petition”). (Pet., ECF No. 1.) The Petition alleges eight grounds for relief. (Pet. 8–121.) In Ground One, Petitioner alleges his sentence was imposed in violation of the ten-year maximum sentence provided under 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2) and in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Pet. 8–9.) In Grounds Two through Eight, Petitioner challenges “individual officer actions” and various incident reports for exceeding or not complying with 28 C.F.R. §§ 541, 542 and 551 and requests—in addition to relief pursuant to Section 2241—the correction of records, including good time credits and custody classification scores, and dismissal and expungement of the incident reports. (See id. at 9–12.) In addition, in Ground Two and Grounds Five through Eight, Petitioner requests the “bond or coverage policy number, other policy information and contact information with respect to the said individual officer(s) involved.” (Id. at 9–12.) On January 27, 2023, Petitioner’s Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees was granted.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.