Johnny Theodore Orsinger v. Mr. Hammed

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20235:22-cv-01417California1,331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHNNY THEODORE ORSINGER, Case No. 5:22-cv-01417-FLA (PD)

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION v. FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

MR. HAMMED,

15 Defendant.

17 I. Pertinent Procedural History and Plaintiff’s Claims On August 8, 2022, Plaintiff Johnny Theodore Orsinger (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 396 (1971), with a request to proceed without prepayment of filing fees. Dkt. Nos. 1, 2. At the time he filed the Complaint, Plaintiff was incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary-Victorville (“USP-Victorville”). Dkt. No. 1 at 1. On August 11, 2022, the court screened the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a)-(b)(1) and dismissed it for failure to adhere to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failure to state sufficient facts warranting a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction against the 28 Bureau of Prisons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.