Hugo De Anda v. Ford Motor Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20232:22-cv-04064California5,500 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6 7

United States District Court Central District of California

12 HUGO DE ANDA, Case № 2:22-cv-04064-ODW (MAAx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING

v.

MOTION TO DISMISS [21]

15 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, INC. et al.,

16 Defendants.

17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Hugo De Anda brings this putative class action against Defendant Ford 20 Motor Company, Inc. for allegedly failing to provide a required emissions warranty 21 for the vehicles that Ford distributes in California. (First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF 22 No. 19.) Ford now moves to dismiss De Anda’s First Amended Complaint for lack of 23 subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim under Federal Rules of Civil 24 Procedure (“Rule” or “Rules”) 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (Mot. Dismiss FAC (“Motion” 25 or “Mot.”), ECF No. 21-1.) For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Ford’s 26 Motion.1

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.