Jesseka Betts v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20235:21-cv-00084California475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 J.B., Case No. 5:21-cv-00084-JWH-SHK Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE Commissioner of Social Security, JUDGE 15 Defendant.

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Defendant has objected. The Court ACCEPTS the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Court notes Defendant’s argument in the Objections that the Report and Recommendation does not address all of the ALJ’s reasons for rejecting Plaintiff’s subjective complaints of impairment. (ECF No. 25 at 2-7.) According to Defendant, in addition to the reasons discussed in the Report and Recommendation, the ALJ rejected…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.