Keith Huckaby v. CRST Expedited, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20232:21-cv-07766California2,632 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 KEITH HUCKABY, Case № 2:21-CV-07766-ODW (PDx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v.

DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

14 CRST EXPEDITED, INC., et al., RECONSIDERATION [61]

15 Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Defendant CRST Expedited, Inc. (“CRST”) moves for reconsideration of the 19 Court’s order granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff Keith Huckaby’s Motion to 20 Certify Class. (Mot. Recons. (“Mot.” or “Motion”), ECF No. 61-1; see also Notice 21 Errata, ECF No. 62 (correcting hearing date for Mot.).) CRST brings the Motion 22 pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule” or “Rules”) 23(c)(1)(C) and 23 60(b) and California Central District Civil Local Rule (“Local Rule”) 7-18. The 24 Motion is fully briefed. (Opp’n, ECF No. 66; Reply, ECF No. 67.) For the following 25 reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART CRST’s Motion 26 for Reconsideration. (ECF No. 61.)

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.