Anthony McDaniel Jr. v. SST. Alton

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20232:23-cv-00878California4,782 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY MCDANIEL, JR., Case No. CV 23-0878 SB (PVC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

v. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND SST. ALTON, et al., Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION 19 On January 31, 2023, Plaintiff Anthony McDaniel, Jr., a California state pretrial detainee proceeding pro se, constructively filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (“Complaint” or “Compl.,” Dkt. No. 1). Plaintiff filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on March 20, 2023, (Dkt. No. 7), which was granted on March 27, 2023. (Dkt. No. 8).

1 The “mailbox rule” announced by the Supreme Court in Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988), applies to section 1983 cases. See Douglas v. Noelle, 567 F.3d 1103, 1107 (9th Cir. 2009). Pursuant to the mailbox rule, pro se prisoner legal filings are deemed filed on the date the prisoner delivers the document to prison officials for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.