Kenneth Lee Stinchcomb v. Brian Birkholtz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KENNETH LEE STINCHCOMB, Case No. 2:22-cv-05024-SSS (GJS)
Petitioner
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
BRIAN BIRKHOLTZ, JUDGE Respondent.
16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition [Dkt. 1], Respondent’s motion to dismiss [Dkt. 9, “Motion”], all other documents filed in this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 20, “Report”]. The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed and no Objections have been received by the Court. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: the 24 25 26 1 For purposes of accuracy, the Court notes that there is a typographical error in the Report’s citation to the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Tripati v. Henman. [See Dkt. 20 at 8.] Rather than a citation to 843 F.3d 1160…