Vincent A. Griffieth v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20232:22-cv-02749California202 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

2 3 4 5 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN DIVISION 10 || VINCENT A. GRIFFIETH, No. 2:22-cv-02749-SSS-PVC

JUDGMENT

Plaintiff, V. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting 14 Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

LDS

Having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment, THE COURT ADJUDGES AND 9 || DECREES that judgment is entered for Plaintiff.' f Hf ° fu DATED: April 13, 2023 || i, 'In Bastidas v. Chappell, 791 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2015), the Ninth Circuit held that the 26 || magistrate judge had the authority to grant Petitioner’s request to dismiss two unexhausted claims in his habeas petition without the approval of a district judge, as 27 || the magistrate judge's order was simply “doing what [the] habeas petitioner has asked.” Id. at 1165. While Bastidas is not entirely on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.