Jamie Peter Swart v. Lyle Forehand
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMIE PETER SWART, Case No. 5:22-cv-01544-DSF (AFM)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING SECOND
13 v. AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
LYLE FOREHAND,
15 Defendant. 16 17 On September 1, 2022, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff is presently being held at the 19 John Benoit Detention Center in Indio, California (“Detention Center”). Plaintiff 20 also filed a Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees, which was 21 granted. (ECF Nos. 2, 4, 6.) 22 23 In the caption of the Complaint, plaintiff named as defendants “Dr. Lyle 24 Forehand” and “Riverside Sheriff’s Office.” (ECF No. 1 at 1.) In the body of the 25 pleading, plaintiff named as defendants “Lyle Forehand, Staff Psychiatrist for 26 Riverside County,” and an “RSO employee” in the position of “intake release.” Both 27 defendants were named in their official as well as individual capacities. (Id. at 3.) 28 1 …