Edmund Edwards v. Charisse Edwards

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20232:23-cv-00552California2,227 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. DISCUSSION

A. Factual Allegations as to Arlene Parkinson, Jack Esensten, Jonathan Udewitz, Dennis Block, Monica Mihell, Naren Hunter, and James Payne Plaintiff’s claims arise from a state probate matter on the administration of the estate of his deceased father. Although all named defendants are listed in the Complaint, see Compl. ¶ 12, the

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: CV 23-00552 FMO (RAO) Date: April 19, 2023 Title: Edmund Edwards v. Charisse Edwards et al.

factual allegations refer only to Charisse Edwards, Krista Edwards, Jeffery D. Calvin, Larry Lewellyn, and Judges Bogdanoff and Lippitt. See Compl. ¶¶ 2-7, 15-20, 35-40. There are no allegations within the text of the Complaint regarding the conduct of Arlene Parkinson, Jack Esensten, Jonathan Udewitz, Dennis Block, Monica Mihell, Naren Hunter, or James Payne. Therefore, Plaintiff fails to state a claim against any of these defendants. While it is not the job of the Court to comb through Plaintiff’s exhibits in an attempt to piece together a claim, the Court has reviewed the exhibits to the Complaint in search of any reference to Arlene Parkinson, Jack Esensten, Jonathan Udewitz, Dennis Block,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.