Wendy Rosales v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20235:21-cv-01692California265 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 21-1692 JGB (SPx) Date April 19, 2023 Title Wendy Rosales, et al. v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company, et al.

Present: The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

TANISHA CARRILLO Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution (IN

CHAMBERS)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) (“Rule 41(b)”), a district court may dismiss an action for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or failure to comply with the court’s orders. See Rule 41(b); see Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 44 (1991) (recognizing that a court “may act sua sponte to dismiss a suit for failure to prosecute”).

Here, it appears that plaintiffs have abandoned their suit. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiffs to show cause in writing on or before May 12,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.