Theresa Brooke v. NPL Anaheim Investments LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20238:23-cv-00392California429 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

__________________________________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: 8:23-cv-00392-FWS-JDE Date: April 21, 2023 Title: Theresa Brooke v. NPL Anaheim Investments LLC

Present: HONORABLE FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Melissa H. Kunig N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:

SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

The court is in receipt of the Complaint filed in this action, which asserts claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010 et seq. and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53. (Dkt. 1.) The court observes that it possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a).

The supplemental jurisdiction statute “reflects the understanding that, when deciding whether to exercise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.