Warden

Carl Davis v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20238:23-cv-00272California619 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL

Case No. SA CV 23-00272-PA (DFM) Date: April 26, 2023 Title Carl Davis v. Warden

Present: The Honorable Douglas F. McCormick, United States Magistrate Judge Nan ose Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorney(s) for Petitioner(s): Attorney(s) for Respondent(s): Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause

On February 13, 2023, Petitioner Carl Davis, a federal prisoner confined at FCI Lompoc, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Dkt. 1 (“Petition”). Petitioner challenges his April 1, 2022 disciplinary conviction for possession of a cell phone. See id. at 2. Petitioner argues that he was denied due process and that R. Rodriguez gave a false statement. See id. at 3. Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Petition should not be dismissed because it is unexhausted and not cognizable in habeas corpus.

I. EXHAUSTION

“Federal prisoners are required to exhaust their federal administrative remedies prior to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.