Lala Maha Visconti v. Internal Revenue Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20235:23-cv-00551California669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 23-0551 JGB (PVC) Date: April 27, 2023 Title Lala Maha Visconti v. Internal Revenue Service, et al.

Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge

Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None

PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT

THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE

A CURRENT ADDRESS

On March 29, 2023, Lala Maha Visconti, a California resident proceeding pro se but not in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1). A summons issued that same day, (“Summons,” Dkt. No. 3), and on April 3, 2023, the Court issued a Notice of Assignment referring this matter for pre-trial proceedings to the above-named Magistrate Judge. (“Notice,” Dkt. No. 4). Both the Summons and the Notice were mailed to Plaintiff via the U.S. Postal Service at her current…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.