Lala Maha Visconti v. Internal Revenue Service
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20235:23-cv-00551California669 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. EDCV 23-0551 JGB (PVC) Date: April 27, 2023 Title Lala Maha Visconti v. Internal Revenue Service, et al.
Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge
Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None
PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT
THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE
A CURRENT ADDRESS
On March 29, 2023, Lala Maha Visconti, a California resident proceeding pro se but not in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1). A summons issued that same day, (“Summons,” Dkt. No. 3), and on April 3, 2023, the Court issued a Notice of Assignment referring this matter for pre-trial proceedings to the above-named Magistrate Judge. (“Notice,” Dkt. No. 4). Both the Summons and the Notice were mailed to Plaintiff via the U.S. Postal Service at her current…