Carey Coco v. The City of Long Beach

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20232:22-cv-08591California4,546 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

RODNEY S. DIGGS, Esq. (SBN 274459) RDiggs@imwlaw.com 2 KAELIN S. DAVIS, Esq. (SBN KDavis@imwlaw.com IVIE McNEILL WYATT PURCELL & DIGGS 4 A Professional Law Corporation 444 South Flower Street, Suite 1800 Los Angeles, California 90071 6 Telephone: (213) 489-0028 Facsimile: (213) 489-0552 Attorneys for Plaintiff, CAREY COCO 8 DAWN MCINTOSH, City Attorney NICHOLAS J. MASERO, Deputy City Attorney 10 State Bar No. 302989 411 W. Ocean Boulevard, 9th Floor Long Beach, California 90802-4664 12 Telephone: (562) 570-2200 Facsimile: (562) 436-1579 Attorneys for Defendant

CITY OF LONG BEACH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17 CAREY COCO, an individual, CASE NO.: 2:22-cv-08591-RGK- Plaintiff, (JEMx) 19 vs. 20 CITY OF LONG BEACH; and STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 21 DOES 1 through 10, inclusive. ORDER 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26

A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

1 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 2 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 3 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 4 be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.