Tiffany Jaco v. Children Services of Shasta County

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20232:22-cv-07397California993 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 Case No. CV 22-7397 SPG (MRW) TIFFANY JACO, et al.,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiffs,

WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

v. CHILDREN’S SERVICES OF SHASTA COUNTY, et al., 17 Defendants.

19 The Court dismisses this action for failure to state a claim and due to the failure of a pro se litigant to respond to a court order. * * * 1. This is a pro se civil action. In a complaint filed in October 2022, Plaintiff alleged that various county employees and officials in Shasta County improperly took her children into care. Plaintiff purported to file the complaint on behalf of herself and other family members. (Docket # 1.) 28 2. After the assigned district judge granted in forma pauperis status to Plaintiff, the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Wilner for screening and other pretrial proceedings. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), Judge Wilner issued an order to show cause why Plaintiff’s case should not be dismissed. (Docket #…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.