Tommy Diaz v. Marc Avent

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20235:16-cv-01861California1,620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Western Division 11 TOMMY DIAZ, Case No. 5:16-cv-01861-CAS (SK) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARC AVENT, Defendant.

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) to deny defendant’s motion for summary judgment (dkt. 164), defendant’s objections to the R&R (dkt. 168), plaintiff’s reply to those objections (dkt. 170), and any pertinent records as needed. The Court has reviewed de novo those identifiable portions of the R&R to which defendant has timely objected, and it concludes that nothing in those objections refutes the material findings and conclusions in the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.