Tremaine Carroll v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20232:18-cv-01832California1,445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TREMAINE CARROLL, Case No. 2:18-cv-01832-SVW-JC 11 Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. I. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY On February 27, 2018, Plaintiff Tremaine Carroll, who is in custody, is proceeding pro se, and was subsequently granted leave to proceed without prepayment of filing fees (“IFP”), submitted a document which was liberally construed as a Civil Rights Complaint (“Complaint”) filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq. (Docket Nos. 1, 20). As Plaintiff is a state prisoner and is proceeding IFP, the Court screened the Complaint to determine if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim 26 27 1This case was previously closed and was reopened on March 18, 2021. (See Docket No. 13 at 2-4). on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.