Ligaya Jensen v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20235:21-cv-01195California5,422 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LIGAYA JENSEN, ) Case No. 5:21-cv-01195-CAS (AFM) ) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS ) ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF v. ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE )

JUDGE

) MERRICK B. GARLAND, United ) States Attorney General, et al., ) ) ) 17 Respondents. ) ) 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records and files herein, including the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. 1, “Petition”), respondents’ supplemental brief (Dkt. 16), petitioner’s supplemental brief (Dkt. 17), respondents’ notice of supplemental authority (Dkt.18), petitioner’s supplemental brief in response (Dkt. 20), the Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 22, “Report”), respondents’ objections to the report (Dkt. 24, “Objection”), and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.