Dominique Daniels v. Wayne J. Dixon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 DOMINIQUE DANIELS, Case No. 8:21-cv-00223-CJC-MAR Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

WAYNE J. DIXON ET AL., UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Defendant(s). 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court overrules Plaintiff’s objections and accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 24 1. The Magistrate Judge did not err in ruling on Plaintiff’s objections to the admissibility of evidence that Defendants proffered in support of summary judgment, including without limitation lack of foundation, and to the extent that any evidentiary Fed. Credit Union, 473 F. App’x 534, 536 n.1 (9th Cir.2012); Jeffries v. Las Vegas Metro. 2 …