Amy L. Stendal v. Memorial Health Services
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 AMY L. STENDAL et al., Case № 2:23-cv-01380-ODW (PDx)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v.
REMAND [10]
14 MEMORIAL HEALTH SERVICES et al.,
15 Defendants.
16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Amy Stendal filed this action in state court, asserting state law wage 19 and hour violations against Defendants Memorial Health Services, Long Beach 20 Memorial Medical Center, and Miller Children’s Hospital Long Beach Auxiliary, Inc. 21 (Decl. Melissa M. Smith ISO Removal Ex. C (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1-2.) Memorial 22 Health and Long Beach Memorial removed the case to this Court on the grounds that 23 one of Stendal’s claims is completely preempted by § 301 of the Labor Management 24 Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185. (Notice of Removal (“NOR”) ¶¶ 8–10, 25 ECF No. 1.) Stendal now moves to remand. (Mot. Remand (“Motion” or “Mot.”), 26 ECF No. 10.) For the reasons that follow, Stendal’s Motion is DENIED.1
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the…