Jose Lafaurie v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20235:22-cv-01865California268 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE LAFAURIE, Case No. EDCV 22-1865 MCS (PVC)

Plaintiff, v. JUDGMENT OF REMAND KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrently with the Judgment of Remand,1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above captioned action is remanded 22 23

1 In Bastidas v. Chappell, 791 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2015), the Ninth Circuit held that the magistrate judge had the authority to grant Petitioner’s request to dismiss two unexhausted claims in his habeas petition without the approval of a district judge, as the magistrate judge’s order was simply “doing what [the] habeas petitioner has asked.” Id. at 1165. While Bastidas is not entirely on point, the stipulation for remand…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.