Moses Urieta v. Capital Benefit, INC.

O

JS-

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 MOISES URIETA, Case № 2:22-cv-07877-ODW (JEMx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. 14 C APITAL BENEFIT, INC. et al., DISMISS [13]

15 Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Moises Urieta brings this loan modification action asserting claims 19 including violation of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) and the Real Estate 20 Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”). (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Defendant Capital 21 Benefit, Inc. moves to dismiss Urieta’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 22 Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). (Mot. Dismiss (“Mot.” or “Motion”), ECF No. 13.) For 23 the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Capital Benefit’s Motion.1 II. BACKGROUND The Court accepts the well-pleaded allegations as true and in the light most 26 favorable to Urieta. Lee v. City of Los Angeles, 250 F.3d 668, 679 (9th Cir. 2001).

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court…