Board of Trustees of the California Ironworkers Field Pension Trust v. Streamline Integration
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
10! 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CV 21—08301-RSWL-KESx GREIFORNAFROWTIONERS oposR se: ORION FOR
AL ATTORNEYS’ FEES [26]
14 Plaintiff, Vv. STREAMLINE INTEGRATION, Defendant. |--— In accordance with the Court’s Order Granting Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. In the prior Order, the Court found that Plaintiffs were entitled to Attorneys’ Fees. See 241 Dkt. No. at 12. The Motion is unopposed. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion. “The most useful starting point for determining the amount of a reasonable fee is the number of hours
reasonably expended on the litigation multiplied by a
reasonable hourly rate,” which is known as the lodestar
calculation. Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 (1983). A district court may consider any of the 5 …