Securities and Exchange Commission v. Michael M. Beck

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20232:22-cv-00812California8,482 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Southern Division 11 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No. 2:22-cv-00812 FWS (JCx) COMMISSION, Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

14 vs. [CHANGES MADE BY COURT TO PARAGRAPHS 3, 8 &, 9]

MICHAEL M. BECK,

16 Defendant,

AND

HELEN P. ROBINSON,

20 Relief Defendant.

23 24 25 26 27 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) further takes the position that when considering whether good cause for a protective order under Rule 26(c) exists, courts must weigh the presumption of openness of litigation materials against the asserted right of confidentiality. When the government is a party to the litigation, those…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.