Mareus St. Hilaire v. Bryan Birkholz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20232:23-cv-00395California410 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:23-cv-00395-ODW-MAA Date: May 18, 2023 Title Mareus St. Hilaire v. Bryan Birkholz

Present: The Honorable MARIA A. AUDERO, United States Magistrate Judge

Narissa Estrada N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent:

N/A N/A

Proceedings (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause Regarding Petitioner’s Failure to File Opposition to Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7)

On January 17, 2023, Petitioner Mareus St. Hilaire (“Petitioner”) filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“Petition”). (Pet., ECF No. 1.) On February 24, 2023, the Court issued an Order Requiring Response to Petition (“ORR”). (ORR, ECF No. 6.) On March 24, 2023, Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss the Petition (“Motion”). (ECF No. 7.) By the terms of the ORR, Petitioner’s Opposition to the Motion was due within thirty days after service of that Motion, or April 23, 2023. (ORR 2.) To date, Petitioner has neither filed an Opposition to the Motion nor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.