Zhiyun Yang v. Ur M. Jaddou

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20232:22-cv-05540California300 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 22-05540-SPG(PLAx) Date May 23, 2023

Title Zhiyun Yang v. Ur. Jaddou et al

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

P. Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK

OF PROSECUTION

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before June 6, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.