Michael Campbell v. Warden Rick Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20232:20-cv-01530California438 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL CAMPBELL, Case No. 2:20-cv-01530-JWH (SHK) Petitioner, v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

WARDEN RICK HILL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Respondent.

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court ACCEPTS the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. In the interest of thoroughness, the Court finds that Ground Three of the Petition fails on both (1) procedural grounds, as stated on pages 15 through 20 of the Report and Recommendation; and (2) on the merits. Specifically, to the extent that Ground Three presents a cognizable federal claim, in light of the evidence presented at trial and the instructions as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.