Pauline Hunter v. Alex Villanueva
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 ) Case No. 2:22-cv-03324-JAK (SP) PAULINE HUNTER, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS ALEX VILLANUEVA, Sheriff, ) AND RECOMMENDATION OF ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE Respondent. ) JUDGE ) ) _____________________________ )
17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, 18 and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the 19 Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which petitioner 20 has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate 21 Judge. 22 For clarity, the Court notes that, even recognizing the Petition as having been 23 brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 rather than 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Petitioner still was 24 required to exhaust judicial remedies unless she established a basis for the Court to waive 25 the requirement, which she has not. See Acevedo-Carranza v.…