Blackwolf
Blackwolf v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20235:22-cv-01994California1,034 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—
GENERAL
Case No. 5:22-cv-01994-SSS-KKx Date June 1, 2023 Title Blackwolf, et al. v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et al.
Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Irene Vazquez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present
Proceedings: ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REMAND [Dkt. 19]
Now before the Court is the motion for remand filed by Plaintiffs “Blackwolf”1 and Blackwolf’s wife, Pamela Blackwolf (“Pamela”). [Motion (Dkt. 19)]. Defendant Costco Wholesale Corp. has opposed the motion [Opp. (Dkt. 20)]. Plaintiffs did not file a reply.
For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and
DENIED IN PART.
I. Legal Standard
A defendant may remove any civil action over which the federal district courts enjoy subject matter jurisdiction. Franchise Tax Bd. v. Constr. Laborers Vacation Tr., 463 U.S. 1, 7-8 (1983). It must remove to the district court for the…