Shahnaz Mauch v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20238:23-cv-00985California1,420 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Background

This is a premises liability action, concerning Plaintiff Shahnaz Mauch’s slip and fall in the premises of Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”). Notice of Removal (“Notice”) (Dkt. 1) ¶ 1, see also Complaint (Dkt. 1–1). Plaintiff alleges that Defendants negligently maintained the premises and caused Plaintiff to slip and fall on “egg matter.” See Complaint at 4. Plaintiff broke her wrist and sprained her ankle as a result. Id.

Plaintiff originally filed suit in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, on February 22, 2023. On June 6, 2023, Defendant removed the action to this Court, asserting diversity jurisdiction. Notice of Removal (Dkt. 1).

II. Legal Standard

“If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Removal of a case

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:23-cv-00985-DOC-KES Date: June 15, 2023 Page

from state court to federal court is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1441, which provides in relevant part that “any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.