Brand Tarzana Surgical Institute, Inc. v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20232:22-cv-03669California216 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BRAND TARZANA SURGICAL ) Case No. CV 22-3669 FMO (PDx)

INSTITUTE, INC., )

) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT v. ) PREJUDICE )

UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, )

INC. et al, ) ) Defendant. ) 16 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 39, Notice of Settlement), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than July 31, 2023, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.