Henri M. Djissa v. Brian Cates

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20232:21-cv-05373California247 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENRI M. DJISSA, Case No. 2:21-cv-05373-JVS-PD

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND ADOPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF

BRIAN CATES,

UNITED STATES

15 Respondent. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the 19 records on file, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate 20 Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Petition. The Court has 21 engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which 22 Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Report and adopts it as its own 23 findings and conclusions. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed with 24 prejudice. 25 Further, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial 26 showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the court erred in its 27 procedural ruling and,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.