Trixia Guerrero v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20235:23-cv-00242California908 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6 TRIXIA GUERRERO, Case No. 5:23-cv-00242-SSS-SPx 7 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO REMAND [DKT. 15]

v. 10 MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, et al., Defendants.

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand this Case to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Riverside (the “Motion”). [Dkt. 25]. For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On or about September 19, 2021, Plaintiff purchased a pre-owned vehicle from Mercedes-Benz of Temecula. On December 3, 2022, Plaintiff filed an action against Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“Mercedes-Benz”) in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Riverside. [Dkt. 15 at 3]. Guerrero alleges two federal causes of action and three state law causes of action. Both federal causes of action arise under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2310(d)(l)(B). Mercedes- Benz removed the case from 12 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.